Paper detail

Polynomial deviation bounds for recurrent Harris processes having general state space

Consider a strong Markov process in continuous time, taking values in some Polish state space. Recently, Douc, Fort and Guillin (2009) introduced verifiable conditions in terms of a supermartingale property implying an explicit control of modulated moments of hitting times. We show how this control can be translated into a control of polynomial moments of abstract regeneration times which are obtained by using the regeneration method of Nummelin, extended to the time-continuous context. As a consequence, if a $p-$th moment of the regeneration times exists, we obtain non asymptotic deviation bounds of the form $$P_ν(|\frac1t\int_0^tf(X_s)ds-μ(f)|\geq\ge)\leq K(p)\frac1{t^{p- 1}}\frac 1{\ge^{2(p-1)}}\|f\|_\infty^{2(p-1)}, p \geq 2. $$ Here, $f$ is a bounded function and $μ$ is the invariant measure of the process. We give several examples, including elliptic stochastic differential equations and stochastic differential equations driven by a jump noise.

preprint2011arXivOpen access
0citations
0reviews
0saves
Nocode
Nodataset
0institutions

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this graph slice

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.