Paper detail

Polynomial approximations in a generalized Nyman-Beurling criterion

The Nyman-Beurling criterion, equivalent to the Riemann hypothesis (RH), is an approximation problem in the space of square integrable functions on $(0,\infty)$, involving dilations of the fractional part function by factors $θ_k\in(0,1)$, $k\ge1$. Randomizing the $θ_k$ generates new structures and criteria. One of them is a sufficient condition for RH that splits into (i) showing that the indicator function can be approximated by convolution with the fractional part, (ii) a control on the coefficients of the approximation. This self-contained paper generalizes conditions (i) and (ii) that involve a $σ_0\in(1/2,1)$, and imply $ζ(σ+it)\neq 0$ in the strip $1/2<σ\leσ_0<1$. We then identify functions for which (i) holds unconditionally, by means of polynomial approximations. This yields in passing a short probabilistic proof of a known consequence of Wiener&#39;s Tauberian theorem. In this context, the difficulty for proving RH is then reallocated in (ii), which heavily relies on the corresponding Gram matrices, for which two remarkable structures are obtained. We show that a particular tuning of the approximating sequence leads to a striking simplification of the second Gram matrix, then reading as a block Hankel form.

preprint2022arXivOpen access
0citations
0reviews
0saves
Nocode
Nodataset
0institutions

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this graph slice

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.