Paper detail

Poles of Karlsruhe-Helsinki KH80 and KA84 solutions extracted by using Laurent+Pietarinen method

Poles of partial wave scattering matrices have also in hadron spectroscopy recently been established as a sole link between experiment and QCD theories and models [1-4]. We have, however, noticed the fact that Karlsruhe-Helsinki (KH) partial wave analyses, one of the two partial wave analyses which have been "above the line" in PDG [1] for over three decades, does calculate and PDG compiles the abundance of Breit-Wigner (BW) parameters obtained by local BW fit, but has produced only a limited number of pole information obtained by using speed plot (SP) method [5]. We stress the fact that in KH method only Mandelstam analyticity is used as a theoretical constraint, so KH partial wave solutions are as model independent as possible. Therefore, they represent a very confident and valuable input, so it is of extreme importance to extract as many resonance pole parameters from them as possible. In addition, the troubling fact is that BW parameters given in PDG have been obtained from KH80 solution, while pole parameters have been obtained from KA84 version of KH solution. To remedy this, we have used newly developed Laurent+Pietarinen expansion method [6,7] for obtaining pole positions for all partial waves for KH80 and KA84 solutions, compared them, and shown that the differences in pole parameters are, with very few discussed exceptions, negligible for all partial waves. We finally give a full set of pole parameters for both solutions for all partial waves; results which are until now unpublished.

preprint2014arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access5 authors1 topic

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.