Paper detail

Polarization signatures of the head-on collision model for Type Ia supernovae: How much asymmetry is too much?

In a previous paper, we showed that the asymmetric ejecta produced by (zero impact parameter) head-on collisions of carbon-oxygen white dwarfs allow these progenitor models for Type Ia supernovae (SNe Ia) to cover the observed two-dimensional (2D) distribution of Si II line depths (Branch plot). In this paper, we study the polarization signature associated with the 2D asymmetric ejecta of the collision model and a double-detonation model using similar TARDIS radiative transfer simulations along different lines of sight with a spherical photosphere, combined with a new 3D Monte Carlo polarization code. We show that the polarization $Q$ can be parametrized as a product $Q=Q_{\max}Q_{\rm{x}}$ of a radial structure component $Q_{\max}$ which is insensitive to the model specifics and is shown to be universally around $Q_{\max}\sim 5\%$, and a cancellation component $Q_{\rm{x}}$ which depends on the asymmetry details. The continuum polarization is found to be low for both the collision and double-detonation models with $Q\sim 0.5\%$. However, the irregular Si distribution in the 2D head-on collision model results in Si II line polarization reaching $Q\sim 3\%$ ($Q_{\rm{x}} \lesssim 50\%$) in tension with observations (mostly $\lesssim 1.2\%$). In contrast, we show that the double-detonation model also covers the Branch plot, and yet results in low line polarization $Q\lesssim 0.7\%$ ($Q_{\rm{x}} \sim 10\%$) consistent with previous results and most SNe Ia. These results strengthen the case for asymmetric explosions as progenitors of SNe Ia, emphasizing an additional requirement for large polarization cancellations to account for the low observed line polarizations.

preprint2021arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access2 authors2 topics

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.