Researcher profile

Ran Livneh

Ran Livneh contributes to research discovery and scholarly infrastructure.

ResearcherAffiliation not importedOpen to collaborate

Trust snapshot

Quick read

Trust 13 - UnverifiedVerification L1Unclaimed author
2works
0followers
2topics
1close collaborators

Actions

Decide how to stay connected

Follow researcher0

Identity and collaboration

How to connect with this researcher

Claiming links this public author record to a researcher profile and unlocks direct collaboration workflows.

Log in to claim

Direct collaboration

Open a focused conversation when the fit is right

Claim this author entity first to unlock direct invitations.

Research graph

See the researcher in context

Open full explorer

Inspect adjacent work, topics, institutions and collaborators without jumping out to a separate graph page.

Building this graph slice

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Published work

2 published item(s)

preprint2021arXiv

Polarization signatures of the head-on collision model for Type Ia supernovae: How much asymmetry is too much?

In a previous paper, we showed that the asymmetric ejecta produced by (zero impact parameter) head-on collisions of carbon-oxygen white dwarfs allow these progenitor models for Type Ia supernovae (SNe Ia) to cover the observed two-dimensional (2D) distribution of Si II line depths (Branch plot). In this paper, we study the polarization signature associated with the 2D asymmetric ejecta of the collision model and a double-detonation model using similar TARDIS radiative transfer simulations along different lines of sight with a spherical photosphere, combined with a new 3D Monte Carlo polarization code. We show that the polarization $Q$ can be parametrized as a product $Q=Q_{\max}Q_{\rm{x}}$ of a radial structure component $Q_{\max}$ which is insensitive to the model specifics and is shown to be universally around $Q_{\max}\sim 5\%$, and a cancellation component $Q_{\rm{x}}$ which depends on the asymmetry details. The continuum polarization is found to be low for both the collision and double-detonation models with $Q\sim 0.5\%$. However, the irregular Si distribution in the 2D head-on collision model results in Si II line polarization reaching $Q\sim 3\%$ ($Q_{\rm{x}} \lesssim 50\%$) in tension with observations (mostly $\lesssim 1.2\%$). In contrast, we show that the double-detonation model also covers the Branch plot, and yet results in low line polarization $Q\lesssim 0.7\%$ ($Q_{\rm{x}} \sim 10\%$) consistent with previous results and most SNe Ia. These results strengthen the case for asymmetric explosions as progenitors of SNe Ia, emphasizing an additional requirement for large polarization cancellations to account for the low observed line polarizations.

preprint2020arXiv

An asymmetric explosion mechanism may explain the diversity of Si II line widths in Type Ia supernovae

Near maximum brightness, the spectra of Type Ia supernovae (SNe Ia) present typical absorption features of Silicon II observed at roughly 6100A and 5750A. The 2-D distribution of the pseudo-equivalent widths (pEWs) of these features is a useful tool for classifying SNe Ia spectra (Branch plot). Comparing the observed distribution of SNe on the Branch plot to results of simulated explosion models, we find that 1-D models fail to cover most of the distribution. In contrast, we find that TARDIS radiative transfer simulations of the WD head-on collision models along different lines of sight almost fully cover the distribution. We use several simplified approaches to explain this result. We perform order-of-magnitude analysis and model the opacity of the Si lines using LTE and NLTE approximations. Introducing a simple toy model of spectral feature formation, we show that the pEW is a good tracer for the extent of the absorption region in the ejecta. Using radiative transfer simulations of synthetic SNe ejecta, we reproduce the observed Branch plot distribution by varying the luminosity of the SN and the Si density profile of the ejecta. We deduce that the success of the collision model in covering the Branch plot is a result of its asymmetry, which allows for a significant range of Si density profiles along different viewing angles, uncorrelated with a range of $^{56}$Ni yields that cover the observed range of SNe Ia luminosity. We use our results to explain the shape and boundaries of the Branch plot distribution.