Paper detail

Polarisation fractions in $B\to V_1 V_2$: U-Spin constraints and new physics signatures

We investigate the decays of $B$ mesons, i.e., $B_d$, $B_s$, $B^+$, and their antiparticles, to two light vector mesons ($B \to V_1V_2$), focusing on the implications of SU(2) U-spin symmetry, which relates $ΔS = 0$ and $ΔS = 1$ decay amplitudes through the interchange $d \leftrightarrow s$. Performing a global fit, we find that the Standard Model (SM) yields only a very poor agreement with the data, both in the exact U-spin limit as well as when substantial U-spin breaking is allowed for. The tension is primarily driven by the unexpectedly small longitudinal polarisation fraction in almost all $ΔS = 1$ decays, especially for $B_s \to K^{*0} \overline{K^{*0}}$, for which the individual disagreement with U-spin based expectation is about $3.5σ$. Within the SM framework, the only effective resolution would be to disregard entirely the hierarchy between the longitudinal and transverse helicity amplitudes, in the heavy quark limit, as dictated by naive factorisation. An alternative would be to invoke new physics (NP) in the $b\to s$ sector that does not respect the hierarchy, and hence can reduce the tension for all the $ΔS=1$ modes. We demonstrate that certain colour suppressed NP operators can alleviate the tension significantly without adversely affecting the agreement for the other modes.

preprint2026arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access4 authors2 topics

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.