Paper detail

Polar Coded Computing: The Role of the Scaling Exponent

We consider the problem of coded distributed computing using polar codes. The average execution time of a coded computing system is related to the error probability for transmission over the binary erasure channel in recent work by Soleymani, Jamali and Mahdavifar, where the performance of binary linear codes is investigated. In this paper, we focus on polar codes and unveil a connection between the average execution time and the scaling exponent $μ$ of the family of codes. The scaling exponent has emerged as a central object in the finite-length characterization of polar codes, and it captures the speed of convergence to capacity. In particular, we show that (i) the gap between the normalized average execution time of polar codes and that of optimal MDS codes is $O(n^{-1/μ})$, and (ii) this upper bound can be improved to roughly $O(n^{-1/2})$ by considering polar codes with large kernels. We conjecture that these bounds could be improved to $O(n^{-2/μ})$ and $O(n^{-1})$, respectively, and provide a heuristic argument as well as numerical evidence supporting this view.

preprint2022arXivOpen access
0citations
0reviews
0saves
Nocode
Nodataset
0institutions

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this graph slice

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.