Paper detail

Poisson ratio and excess low-frequency vibrational states in glasses

In glass, starting from a dependence of the Angell's fragility on the Poisson ratio [V. N. Novikov and A. P. Sokolov, Nature 431, 961 (2004)], and a dependence of the Poisson ratio on the atomic packing density [G. N. Greaves et al., Nat. Mater. 10, 823 (2011)], we propose that the heterogeneities are predominantly density fluctuations in strong glasses (lower Poisson ratio) and shear elasticity fluctuations in fragile glasses (higher Poisson ratio). Because the excess of low-frequency vibration modes in comparison with the Debye regime (boson peak) is strongly connected to these fluctuations, we propose that they are breathing-like (with change of volume) in strong glasses and shear-like (without change of volume) in fragile glasses. As a verification, it is confirmed that the excess modes in the strong silica glass are predominantly breathing-like. Moreover, it is shown that the excess breathing-like modes in a strong polymeric glass are replaced by shear-like modes under hydrostatic pressure as the glass becomes more compact.

preprint2013arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access3 authors1 topic

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.