Plausible explanation of the Δ5/2+(2000)Δ_{5/2^{+}}(2000) puzzle

preprint2011arXivOpen access

Abstract

From a Faddeev calculation for the π−(Δρ)N5/2−(1675)π-(Δρ)_{N_{5/2^{-}}(1675)} system we show the plausible existence of three dynamically generated I(JP)=3/2(5/2+)I(J^{P})=3/2 (5/2^{+}) baryon states below 2.3 GeV whereas only two resonances, Δ5/2+(1905)(∗∗∗∗)Δ_{5/2^{+}}(1905)(\ast\ast\ast\ast) and Δ5/2+(2000)(∗∗),Δ_{5/2^{+}}(2000)(\ast\ast), are cataloged in the Particle Data Book Review. Our results give theoretical support to data analyses extracting two distinctive resonances, Δ5/2+(∼1740)Δ_{5/2^{+}}(\sim1740) and Δ5/2+(∼2200),Δ_{5/2^{+}}(\sim2200), from which the mass of Δ5/2+(2000)(∗∗)Δ_{5/2^{+}}(2000)(\ast\ast) is estimated. We propose that these two resonances should be cataloged instead of Δ5/2+(2000).Δ_{5/2^{+}}(2000). This proposal gets further support from the possible assignment of the other baryon states found in the approach in the I=1/2,3/2I=1/2,3/2 with JP=1/2+,3/2+,5/2+J^{P}=1/2^{+},3/2^{+},5/2^+ sectors to known baryonic resonances. In particular, Δ1/2+(1750)(∗)Δ_{1/2^{+}}(1750)(\ast) is naturally interpreted as a πN1/2−(1650)πN_{1/2^{-}}(1650) bound state.

Explore this paper’s authors, topics and related work.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Reviews 0

Write a reviewWrite

No reviews yet.

Discussion 0

Add a commentWrite

No comments yet.