Paper detail

Plasmonic Photothermal Therapy in Third and Fourth Biological Windows

The recently reported 3rd and 4th biological transparency windows located respectively at 1.6-1.9um and 2.1-2.3um promise deeper tissue penetration and reduced collateral photodamage, yet they haven't been utilized in photothermal therapy applications. Nanoparticle based plasmonic photothermal therapy poses a nontrivial optimization problem in which the light absorption efficiency of the nanoparticle has to be maximized subject to various constraints that are imposed by application environment. Upscaling the typical absorber-dominant nanoparticle designs (rod, sphere etc.) that operate in the 1st and 2nd transparency windows is not a viable option as their size gets prohibitively large for cell intrusion and they become scatterer-dominant. The present study addresses this issue and suggests a versatile approach for designing both lithography based and self-assembling absorber dominant nanostructures for the new transparency windows, while keeping their size relatively small. The proposed nanoparticles demonstrate up to 40% size reduction and 2-fold increase in absorption efficiency compared to the conventional nanobar design. The overall photothermal performance per nanoparticle in the 4th window is boosted up by 250% compared to the 2nd window.

preprint2016arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access2 authors4 topics

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.