Paper detail

Plaquette versus ordinary $d$-wave pairing in the $t'$-Hubbard model on a width 4 cylinder

The Hubbard model and its extensions are important microscopic models for understanding high- $T_c$ superconductivity in cuprates. In the model with next-nearest-neighbor hopping $t&#39;$ (the $t&#39;$- Hubbard model), pairing is strongly influenced by $t&#39;$ . In particular, a recent study on a width-4 cylinder observed quasi-long-rage superconducting order, associated with a negative $t&#39;$ , which was taken to imply superconductivity in the two-dimensional (2D) limit. In this work we study more carefully pairing in the width-4 $t&#39;$-Hubbard model. We show that in this specific system, the pairing symmetry with $t&#39;<0$ is not the ordinary $d$-wave one would expect in the 2D limit. Instead we observe a so-called plaquette d-wave pairing. The plaquette d-wave exists only on a width-4 cylinder, and so is not representative of the 2D limit. We find that a negative $t&#39;$ suppresses the conventional d-wave, leading to plaquette pairing. In contrast, a different $t&#39;&#39;$ coupling acting diagonally on the plaquettes suppresses plaquette pairing, leading to conventional $d$-wave pairing.

preprint2020arXivOpen access
0citations
0reviews
0saves
Nocode
Nodataset
0institutions

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this graph slice

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.