Paper detail

Planning and Formulations in Pursuit-Evasion: Keep-away Games and Their Strategies

We study a pursuit-evasion problem which can be viewed as an extension of the keep-away game. In the game, pursuer(s) will attempt to intersect or catch the evader, while the evader can visit a fixed set of locations, which we denote as the anchors. These anchors may or may not be stationary. When the velocity of the pursuers is limited and considered low compared to the evaders, we are interested in whether a winning strategy exists for the pursuers or the evaders, or the game will draw. When the anchors are stationary, we show an algorithm that can help answer the above question. The primary motivation for this study is to explore the boundaries between kinematic and dynamic constraints. In particular, whether the solution of the kinematic problem can be used to speed up the search for the problems with dynamic constraints and how to discretize the problem to utilize such relations best. In this work, we show that a geometric branch-and-bound type of approach can be used to solve the stationary anchor problem, and the approach and the solution can be extended to solve the dynamic problem where the pursuers have dynamic constraints, including velocity and acceleration bounds.

preprint2022arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access2 authors1 topic

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.