Paper detail

Pitfalls on the determination of the universality class of radial clusters

The self-affinity of growing systems with radial symmetry, from tumors to grain-grain displacement, has devoted increasing interest in the last decade. In this work, we analyzed features about the interface scaling of these clusters through large scale simulations (up to $3\times 10^7$ particles) of two-dimensional growth processes with special emphasis on the off-lattice Eden model. The central objective is to discuss an important pitfall associated to the evaluation of the growth exponent $β$ of these systems. We show that the $β$ value depends on the choice of the origin used to determine the interface width. We considered two strategies frequently used. When the width is evaluated in relation to the center of mass (CM) of the border, the exponent obtained for the Eden model was $β_{CM}=0.404\pm0.013$, in very good agreement with previous reported values. However, if the border CM is replaced by the initial seed position (a static origin), the exponent $β_0=0.333\pm 0.010$, in complete agreement with the KPZ value $β_{KPZ}=1/3$, was found. The difference between $β_{CM}$ and $β_{0}$ was explained through the border CM fluctuations that grow faster than the overall interface fluctuations. Indeed, we show that the exponents $β_0$ and $β_{CM}$ characterize large and small wavelength fluctuations of the interface, respectively. These finds were also observed in three distinct lattice models, in which the lattice-imposed anisotropy is absent.

preprint2006arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access2 authors1 topic

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.