Paper detail

Pion Beta Decay and CKM Unitarity

Pion beta decay, $π^+\to π^0 e^+ν(γ)$, provides a theoretically clean $\pm 0.3\%$ determination of the CKM matrix element $V_{\text{ud}}$. That value falls short of super-allowed nuclear beta decays where an order of magnitude better precision already exists. We advocate a new strategy for utilizing pion beta decay, based on its role in determining ${V_{\text{us}} / V_{\text{ud}}}$ via the ratio $R_V=Γ\left(K\to πl ν(γ)\right)/Γ\left(π^+\to π^0 e^+ν(γ)\right)$. $R_V$ measures $ { f_+^K(0) |V_{\text{us}}| / f_+^π(0) |V_{\text{ud}}| }$ and is insensitive to the Fermi constant and some radiative corrections. Its dependence on the ratio of form factors may also prove useful for lattice gauge theory calculations. Employing a lattice based value ${ f_+^K(0) / f_+^π(0) } = 0.970(2)$, we find $V_{\text{us}}/V_{\text{ud}}=0.22918(88)$ compared to $V_{\text{us}}/V_{\text{ud}}=0.23131(45)$ obtained from $R_A=Γ(K\to μν(γ))/Γ(π\to μν(γ))$. Those vector and axial-vector based $V_{\text{us}}/V_{\text{ud}}$ values exhibit a 2.2$σ$ discrepancy. That tension may be relieved by a shift in the lattice $ { f_+^K(0) / f_+^π(0) } $ towards the consistency range 0.961(4), changes in experimental input or new physics. Other implications of $R_V$ and $R_A$ are also discussed.

preprint2020arXivOpen access
0citations
0reviews
0saves
Nocode
Nodataset
0institutions

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this graph slice

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.