Paper detail

Physical Layer Abstraction Model for RadioWeaves

RadioWeaves, in which distributed antennas with integrated radio and compute resources serve a large number of users, is envisioned to provide high data rates in next generation wireless systems. In this paper, we develop a physical layer abstraction model to evaluate the performance of different RadioWeaves deployment scenarios. This model helps speed up system-level simulators of the RadioWeaves and is made up of two blocks. The first block generates a vector of signal-to-interference-plus-noise ratios (SINRs) corresponding to each coherence block, and the second block predicts the packet error rate corresponding to the SINRs generated. The vector of SINRs generated depends on different parameters such as the number of users, user locations, antenna configurations, and precoders. We have also considered different antenna gain patterns, such as omni-directional and directional microstrip patch antennas. Our model exploits the benefits of exponential effective SINR mapping (EESM). We study the robustness and accuracy of the EESM for RadioWeaves.

preprint2022arXivOpen access
0citations
0reviews
0saves
Nocode
Nodataset
0institutions

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this graph slice

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.