Paper detail

Photonic lantern behaviour and implications for instrument design

Photonic lanterns are an important enabling technology for astrophotonics with a wide range of potential applications including fibre Bragg grating OH suppression, integrated photonic spectrographs and fibre scramblers for high resolution spectroscopy. The behaviour of photonic lanterns differs in several important respects from the conventional fibre systems more frequently used in astronomical instruments and a detailed understanding of this behaviour is required in order to make the most effective use of this promising technology. To this end we have undertaken a laboratory study of photonic lanterns with the aim of developing an empirical model for the mapping from input to output illumination distributions. We have measured overall transmission and near field output light distributions as a function of input angle of incidence for photonic lanterns with between 19 and 61 cores. We present the results of this work, highlight the key differences between photonic lanterns and conventional fibres, and illustrate the implications for instrument design via a case study, the design of the PRAXIS spectrograph. The empirical photonic lantern model was incorporated into an end-to-end PRAXIS performance model which was used to optimise the design parameters of the instrument. We describe the methods used and the resulting conclusions. The details of photonic lantern behaviour proved particularly important in selecting the optimum on sky field of view per fibre and in modelling of the instrument thermal background.

preprint2014arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access4 authors1 topic

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.