Paper detail

Phi-Divergence test statistics for testing the validity of latent class models for binary data

The main purpose of this paper is to present new families of test statistics for studying the problem of goodness-of-fit of some data to a latent class model for binary data. The families of test statistics introduced are based on phi-divergence measures, a natural extension of maximum likelihood. We also treat the problem of testing a nested sequence of latent class models for binary data. For these statistics, we obtain their asymptotic distribution. We shall consider consistent estimators introduced in Felipe et al (2014) for solving the problem of estimation. Finally, a simulation study is carried out in order to compare the efficiency, in the sense of the level and the power, of the new statistics considered in this paper for sample sizes that are not big enough to apply the asymptotical results.

preprint2014arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access4 authors1 topic

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.