Paper detail

Phi-divergence statistics for the likelihood ratio order: an approach based on log-linear models

When some treatments are ordered according to the categories of an ordinal categorical variable (e.g., extent of side effects) in a monotone order, one might be interested in knowing wether the treatments are equally effective or not. One way to do that is to test if the likelihood ratio order is strictly verified. A method based on log-linear models is derived to make statistical inference and phi-divergence test-statistics are proposed for the test of interest. Focussed on loglinear modeling, the theory associated with the asymptotic distribution of the phi-divergence test-statistics is developed. An illustrative example motivates the procedure and a simulation study for small and moderate sample sizes shows that it is possible to find phi-divergence test-statistic with an exact size closer to nominal size and higher power in comparison with the classical likelihood ratio.

preprint2014arXivOpen access
0citations
0reviews
0saves
Nocode
Nodataset
0institutions

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this graph slice

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.