Paper detail

Phenomenology of the new light Higgs bosons in Gildener-Weinberg model

Gildener-Weinberg (GW) models of electroweak symmetry breaking are especially interesting because the low mass and nearly Standard Model couplings of the $125\,{\rm GeV}$ Higgs boson, $H$, are protected by approximate scale symmetry. Another important but so far under-appreciated feature of these models is that a sum rule bounds the masses of the new charged and neutral Higgs bosons appearing in {\em all} these models to be below about $500\,{\rm GeV}$. Therefore, they are within reach of LHC data currently or soon to be in hand. Also so far unnoticed of these models, certain cubic and quartic Higgs scalar couplings vanish at the classical level. This is due to spontaneous breaking of the scale symmetry. These couplings become nonzero from explicit scale breaking in the Coleman-Weinberg loop expansion of the effective potential. In a two-Higgs doublet GW model, we calculate $λ_{HHH} \simeq 2(λ_{HHH})_{\rm SM} = 64\,{\rm GeV}$. This corresponds to $σ(pp \to HH) \cong 15$--$20\,{\rm fb}$, its {\em minimum} value for $\sqrt{s} = 13$--$14\,{\rm TeV}$ at the LHC. It will require at least the $27\,{\rm TeV}$ HE-LHC to observe this cross section. We also find $λ_{HHHH} \simeq 4(λ_{HHHH})_{\rm SM} = 0.129$, whose observation in $pp \to HHH$ requires a $100\,{\rm TeV}$ collider. Because of the above-mentioned sum rule, these results apply to {\em all} GW models. In view of this unpromising forecast, we stress that LHC searches for the new relatively light Higgs bosons of GW models are by far the surest way to test them in this decade.

preprint2020arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access2 authors1 topic

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.