Paper detail

Phenomenology of bivariate approximants: the pi0 to e+e- case and its impact on the electron and muon g-2

The current 3$σ$ discrepancy between experiment and Standard Model predictions for $π^0 \to e^+e^-$ is reconsidered using the Padé Theory for bivariate functions, the Canterbury approximants. This method provides a model-independent data-driven approximation to the decay as soon as experimental data for the doubly virtual $π^0$ transition form factor are available. It also implements the correct QCD constraints of the form factor both at low- and high-energies. We reassess the Standard Model result including, for the first time, a systematic error. Our result, BR$(π^0 \to e^+e^-)=6.23(5)\times 10^{-8}$, still represents a discrepancy larger than $2σ$, unsurmountable with our present knowledge of the Standard Model, and would claim New Physics if the experimental result is confirmed by a new measurement. Our method also provides the adequate tool to extract the doubly virtual form factor from experimental data in a straightforward manner. This measurement would further shrink our error and establish once and for all the New Physics nature of the discrepancy. In addition, we remark the challenge this discrepancy poses in the evaluation of the hadronic light-by-light scattering contribution to the $(g-2)_μ$, specially confronted with the foreseen accuracy of the forthcoming $(g-2)_μ$ experiments.

preprint2016arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access2 authors1 topic

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.