Paper detail

Phenomenological theory of the Potts model evaporation-condensation transition

We present a phenomenological theory describing the finite-size evaporation-condensation transition of the $q$-state Potts model in the microcanonical ensemble. Our arguments rely on the existence of an exponent $σ$, relating the surface and the volume of the condensed phase droplet. The evaporation-condensation transition temperature and energy converge to their infinite-size values with the same power, $a=(1-σ)/(2-σ)$, of the inverse of the system size. For the 2D Potts model we show, by means of efficient simulations up to $q=24$ and $1024^2$ sites, that the exponent $a$ is compatible with $1/4$, in disagreement with previous studies. While this value cannot be addressed by the evaporation-condensation theory developed for the Ising model, it is obtained in the present scheme if $σ=2/3$, in agreement with previous theoretical guesses. The connection with the phenomenon of metastability in the canonical ensemble is also discussed.

preprint2015arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access1 author1 topic

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.