Paper detail

Phenomenological Consequences of See-Saw in S4 Based Models

It was proposed a flavour model based on the symmetry group S4, managing to describe fermion masses and mixings. The Weinberg operator has been used in order to provide the smallness of the neutrino masses, while a set of scalar fields, getting non-vanishing vacuum expectation values, spontaneously breaks down S4 and provides the Tri-Bimaximal pattern as the lepton mixing matrix. Restricting to this setting, in this paper we analyze possible origins for the effective terms: the type I See-Saw mechanism is the best known approach, but also the type II and III are discussed. The phenomenology related to these models is various and the next future experiments could in principle discriminate among these proposals. Furthermore, we compare our realizations to two relevant A4 based models, also predicting the Tri-Bimaximal lepton mixing, and we find that an analysis on the neutrinoless double beta decay parameters could distinguish among all these realizations. Furthermore a combined measurement of the effective mass and of the lightest neutrino mass could indicate in the next future which is the preferred flavour symmetry group. The introduction of new physics beyond the Standard Model, like heavy right-handed neutrinos, scalar triplets and fermion triplets, let us investigate on leptogenesis and this provides constraints in the realization of the models.

preprint2009arXivOpen access
0citations
0reviews
0saves
Nocode
Nodataset
0institutions

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this graph slice

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.