Paper detail

Phenomenological analysis of the double pion production in nucleon-nucleon collisions up to 2.2 GeV

With an effective Lagrangian approach, we analyze several NN \to NNππchannels by including various resonances with mass up to 1.72 GeV. For the channels with the pion pair of isospin zero, we confirm the dominance of N*(1440)\to Nσin the near threshold region. At higher energies and for channels with the final pion pair of isospin one, we find large contributions from N*(1440)\to Δπ, double-Delta, Δ(1600) \to N*(1440)π, Δ(1600) \to Δπand Δ(1620) \to Δπ. There are also sizeable contributions from Δ\to Δπ, Δ\to Nπ, N \to Δπand nucleon pole at energies close to the threshold. We well reproduce the total cross sections up to beam energies of 2.2 GeV except for the pp\to ppπ^0π^0 channel at energies around 1.1 GeV and our results agree with the existing data of differential cross sections of pp \to ppπ^+π^-, pp \to nnπ^+π^+ and pp \to ppπ^0π^0 which are measured at CELSIUS and COSY.

preprint2010arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access3 authors1 topic

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.