Paper detail

Phase Transition and Regularized Bootstrap in Large Scale $t$-tests with False Discovery Rate Control

Applying Benjamini and Hochberg (B-H) method to multiple Student's $t$ tests is a popular technique in gene selection in microarray data analysis. Because of the non-normality of the population, the true p-values of the hypothesis tests are typically unknown. Hence, it is common to use the standard normal distribution N(0,1), Student's $t$ distribution $t_{n-1}$ or the bootstrap method to estimate the p-values. In this paper, we first study N(0,1) and $t_{n-1}$ calibrations. We prove that, when the population has the finite 4-th moment and the dimension $m$ and the sample size $n$ satisfy $\log m=o(n^{1/3})$, B-H method controls the false discovery rate (FDR) at a given level $α$ asymptotically with p-values estimated from N(0,1) or $t_{n-1}$ distribution. However, a phase transition phenomenon occurs when $\log m\geq c_{0}n^{1/3}$. In this case, the FDR of B-H method may be larger than $α$ or even tends to one. In contrast, the bootstrap calibration is accurate for $\log m=o(n^{1/2})$ as long as the underlying distribution has the sub-Gaussian tails. However, such light tailed condition can not be weakened in general. The simulation study shows that for the heavy tailed distributions, the bootstrap calibration is very conservative. In order to solve this problem, a regularized bootstrap correction is proposed and is shown to be robust to the tails of the distributions. The simulation study shows that the regularized bootstrap method performs better than the usual bootstrap method.

preprint2013arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access2 authors1 topic

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.