Paper detail

Phase fluctuations versus Gaussian fluctuations in optimally-doped YBa$_2$Cu$_3$O$_7$

We analyze recent torque measurements of the magnetization $M_d$ vs. magnetic field $H$ in optimally doped YBa$_2$Cu$_3$O$_{7-y}$ (OPT YBCO) to argue against a recent proposal by Rey et al that the magnetization results above $T_c$ are consistent with Gaussian fluctuations. We find that, despite its strong interlayer coupling, OPT YBCO displays an anomalous non-monotonic dependence of $M_d$ on $H$ which represents direct evidence for the locking of the pair wavefunction phase $θ_n$ at $T_c$ and the subsequent unlocking by a relatively weak $H$. These unusual features characterize the unusual nature of the transition to the Meissner state in cuprate superconductors. They are absent in low-$T_c$ superconductors to our knowledge. We also stress the importance of the vortex liquid state, as well as the profiles of the melting field $H_m(T)$ and the upper critical field curve $H_{c2}(T)$ in the $T$-$H$ plane. Contrary to the claims of Rey et al, we show that the curves of the magnetization and the Nernst signal illustrate the inaccessibility of the $H_{c2}$ line near $T_c$. The prediction of the $H_{c2}$ line by Rey et al is shown to be invalid in OPT YBCO.

preprint2013arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access3 authors1 topic

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.