Paper detail

Phase diagram and polarization of stable phases of (Ga$_{1-x}$In$_x$)$_2$O$_3$

Using density-functional ab initio calculations, we provide a revised phase diagram of (Ga$_{1-x}$In$_{x})_2$O$_3$. Three phases --monoclinic, hexagonal, cubic bixbyite-- compete for the ground state. In particular, in the $x$$\sim$0.5 region we expect coexistence of hexagonal, $β$, and bixbyite (the latter separating into binary components). Over the whole $x$ range, mixing occurs in three disconnected regions, and non-mixing in two additional distinct regions. We then explore the permanent polarization of the various phases, finding that none of them is polar at any concentration, despite the possible symmetry reductions induced by alloying. On the other hand, we find that the $\varepsilon$ phase of Ga$_2$O$_3$ stabilized in recent growth experiments is pyroelectric --i.e. locked in a non-switchable polarized structure-- with ferroelectric-grade polarization and respectable piezoelectric coupling. We suggest that this phase could be used profitably to produce high-density electron gases in transistor structures.

preprint2015arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access2 authors1 topic

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.