Source author record

Maria Barbara Maccioni

Maria Barbara Maccioni appears in the imported research catalog. Authorship, coauthor and topic links are available while profile ownership is still unclaimed.

ResearcherUnclaimed source record

Catalog footprint

What is connected

3works
1topics
2close collaborators

Actions

Connect this record

Log in to claim

Research graph

See the researcher in context

Open full explorer

Inspect adjacent papers, topics, institutions and collaborators without losing the researcher page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Published work

3 published item(s)

preprint2015arXiv

Phase diagram and polarization of stable phases of (Ga$_{1-x}$In$_x$)$_2$O$_3$

Using density-functional ab initio calculations, we provide a revised phase diagram of (Ga$_{1-x}$In$_{x})_2$O$_3$. Three phases --monoclinic, hexagonal, cubic bixbyite-- compete for the ground state. In particular, in the $x$$\sim$0.5 region we expect coexistence of hexagonal, $β$, and bixbyite (the latter separating into binary components). Over the whole $x$ range, mixing occurs in three disconnected regions, and non-mixing in two additional distinct regions. We then explore the permanent polarization of the various phases, finding that none of them is polar at any concentration, despite the possible symmetry reductions induced by alloying. On the other hand, we find that the $\varepsilon$ phase of Ga$_2$O$_3$ stabilized in recent growth experiments is pyroelectric --i.e. locked in a non-switchable polarized structure-- with ferroelectric-grade polarization and respectable piezoelectric coupling. We suggest that this phase could be used profitably to produce high-density electron gases in transistor structures.

preprint2015arXiv

Properties of (Ga$_{1-x}$In$_x$)$_2$O$_3$ over the whole $x$ range

Using density-functional ab initio theoretical techniques, we study (Ga$_{1-x}$In$_x$)$_2$O$_3$ in both its equilibrium structures (monoclinic $β$ and bixbyite) and over the whole range of composition. We establish that the alloy exhibits a large and temperature-independent miscibility gap. On the low-$x$ side, the favored phase is isostructural with $β$-Ga$_2$O$_3$; on the high-$x$ side, it is isostructural with bixbyite In$_2$O$_3$. The miscibility gap opens between approximately 15\% and 55\% In content for the bixbyite alloy grown epitaxially on In$_2$O$_3$, and 15\% and 85\% In content for the free-standing bixbyite alloy. The gap, volume and band offsets to the parent compound also exhibit anomalies as function of $x$. Specifically, the offsets in epitaxial conditions are predominantly type-B staggered, but have opposite signs in the two end-of-range phases.

preprint2014arXiv

Low In solubility and band offsets in the small-$x$ $β$-Ga$_2$O$_3$/(Ga$_{1-x}$In$_x$)$_2$O$_3$ system

Based on first-principles calculations, we show that the maximum reachable concentration $x$ in the (Ga$_{1-x}$In$_x$)$_2$O$_3$ alloy in the low-$x$ regime (i.e. In solubility in $β$-Ga$_2$O$_3$) is around 10%. We then calculate the band alignment at the (100) interface between $β$-Ga$_2$O$_3$ and (Ga$_{1-x}$In$_x$)$_2$O$_3$ at 12%, the nearest computationally treatable concentration. The alignment is strongly strain-dependent: it is of type-B staggered when the alloy is epitaxial on Ga$_2$O$_3$, and type-A straddling in a free-standing superlattice. Our results suggest a limited range of applicability of low-In-content GaInO alloys.