Paper detail

Phase behaviour and the random phase approximation for ultrasoft restricted primitive models

Phase separation of the ultrasoft restricted primitive model (URPM) with Gaussian charges is re-investigated in the random phase approximation (RPA)---the 'Level A' approximation discussed by Nikoubashman, Hansen and Kahl [J. Chem. Phys. 137, 094905 (2012)]. We find that the RPA predicts a region of low temperature vapour-liquid coexistence, with a critical density much lower than that observed in either simulations or more refined approximations (we also remark that the RPA critical point for a related model with Bessel charges can be solved analytically). This observation suggests that the hierarchy of approximations introduced by Nikoubashman et al. should be analogous to those introduced by Fisher and Levin for the restricted primitive model [Phys. Rev. Lett. 71, 3826 (1993)], which makes the inability of these approximations to capture the observed URPM phase behaviour even more worthy of investigation.

preprint2013arXivOpen access
0citations
0reviews
0saves
Nocode
Nodataset
0institutions

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this graph slice

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.