Paper detail

Phase behavior of binary mixtures of hard convex polyehdra

Shape anisotropy of colloidal nanoparticles has emerged as an important design variable for engineering assemblies with targeted structure and properties. In particular, a number of polyhedral nanoparticles have been shown to exhibit a rich phase behavior [Agarwal et al., Nature Materials, 2011, 10, 230]. Since real synthesized particles have polydispersity not only in size but also in shape, we explore here the phase behavior of binary mixtures of hard convex polyhedra having similar sizes but different shapes. Choosing representative particle shapes from those readily synthesizable, we study in particular four mixtures: (i) cubes and spheres (with spheres providing a non-polyhedral reference case), (ii) cubes and truncated octahedra, (iii) cubes and cuboctahedra, and (iv) cuboctahedra and truncated octahedra. The phase behavior of such mixtures is dependent on the interplay of mixing and packing entropy, which can give rise to miscible or phase-separated states. The extent of mixing of two such particle types is expected to depend on the degree of shape similarity, relative sizes, composition, and compatibility of the crystal structures formed by the pure components. While expectedly the binary systems studied exhibit phase separation at high pressures due to the incompatible pure-component crystal structures, our study shows that the essential qualitative trends in miscibility and phase separation can be correlated to properties of the pure components, such as the relative values of the order-disorder transition pressure (ODP) of each component. Specifically, if for a mixture A+B we have that ODP_B <ODP_A and ΔODP = ODP_A - ODP_B, then at any particular pressure where phase separation occurs, the larger the ΔODP the lower the solubility of A in the B-rich ordered phase and the higher the solubility of B in the A-rich ordered phase.

preprint2013arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access3 authors4 topics

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.