Paper detail

Perturbation theory for an Anderson quantum dot asymmetrically attached to two superconducting leads

Self-consistent perturbation expansion up to the second order in the interaction strength is used to study a single-level quantum dot with local Coulomb repulsion attached asymmetrically to two generally different superconducting leads. At zero temperature and wide range of other parameters the spin-symmetric version of the expansion yields excellent results for the position of the $0-π$ impurity quantum phase transition boundary and Josephson current together with the energy of Andreev bound states in the $0$-phase as confirmed by numerical calculations using the Numerical Renormalisation Group method. We analytically prove that the method is charge-conserving as well as thermodynamically consistent. Explicit formulas for the position of the $0-π$ phase boundary are presented for the Hartree-Fock approximation as well as for its variant called Generalized Atomic Limit. It is shown that the Generalized Atomic Limit can be used as a quick estimate for the position of the phase boundary at half-filling in a broad range of parameters. We apply our second order perturbation method to the interpretation of the existing experimental data on the phase boundary with very satisfactory outcome suggesting that the so far employed heavy numerical tools such as Numerical Renormalization Group and/or Quantum Monte Carlo are not necessary in a class of generic situations and can be safely replaced by a perturbative approach.

preprint2016arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access4 authors3 topics

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.