Paper detail

Personalizing Federated Medical Image Segmentation via Local Calibration

Medical image segmentation under federated learning (FL) is a promising direction by allowing multiple clinical sites to collaboratively learn a global model without centralizing datasets. However, using a single model to adapt to various data distributions from different sites is extremely challenging. Personalized FL tackles this issue by only utilizing partial model parameters shared from global server, while keeping the rest to adapt to its own data distribution in the local training of each site. However, most existing methods concentrate on the partial parameter splitting, while do not consider the \textit{inter-site in-consistencies} during the local training, which in fact can facilitate the knowledge communication over sites to benefit the model learning for improving the local accuracy. In this paper, we propose a personalized federated framework with \textbf{L}ocal \textbf{C}alibration (LC-Fed), to leverage the inter-site in-consistencies in both \textit{feature- and prediction- levels} to boost the segmentation. Concretely, as each local site has its alternative attention on the various features, we first design the contrastive site embedding coupled with channel selection operation to calibrate the encoded features. Moreover, we propose to exploit the knowledge of prediction-level in-consistency to guide the personalized modeling on the ambiguous regions, e.g., anatomical boundaries. It is achieved by computing a disagreement-aware map to calibrate the prediction. Effectiveness of our method has been verified on three medical image segmentation tasks with different modalities, where our method consistently shows superior performance to the state-of-the-art personalized FL methods. Code is available at https://github.com/jcwang123/FedLC.

preprint2022arXivOpen access
0citations
0reviews
0saves
Nocode
Nodataset
0institutions

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this graph slice

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.