Paper detail

Persistent Thermal Inhomogeneities in a Gas-Cluster Mixture

Surface tension of small grains and droplets makes them stable only at a much lower temperature than in bulk. This makes spontaneous nucleation unfavorable in many cases. Kinetic approaches are delicate in that one can easily generate models that do not agree with thermodynamics in the large N limit. Here it is shown that thermodynamics itself dictates a kind of temperature suppression inside each small cluster in any gas-cluster mixture. This gives a different perspective on the "translation-rotation" paradox in that this gives a time averaged steady state thermal inhomogeneity rather than just temporal fluctuations in the energy. This not only reduces the barrier to nucleation but also suggests a change in the thermal radiation spectrum from such a mixture that is not just a result of the inhibited radiation spectrum from Mie radiators. Either verification or refutation of this effect will be shown have important consequences for thermodynamics. An understanding of this effect will be essential to kinetic approaches to nucleation theory.

preprint2014arXivOpen access
0citations
0reviews
0saves
Nocode
Nodataset
0institutions

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this graph slice

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.