Paper detail

Persistent Memory Objects: Fast and Easy Crash Consistency for Persistent Memory

DIMM-compatible persistent memory unites memory and storage. Prior works utilize persistent memory either by combining the filesystem with direct access on memory mapped files or by managing it as a collection of objects while abolishing the POSIX abstraction. In contrast, we propose retaining the POSIX abstraction and extending it to provide support for persistent memory, using Persistent Memory Objects (PMOs). In this work, we design and implement PMOs, a crash-consistent abstraction for managing persistent memory. We introduce psync, a single system call, that a programmer can use to specify crash consistency points in their code, without needing to orchestrate durability explicitly. When rendering data crash consistent, our design incurs a overhead of $\approx 25\%$ and $\approx 21\%$ for parallel workloads and FileBench, respectively, compared to a system without crash consistency. Compared to NOVA-Fortis, our design provides a speedup of $\approx 1.67\times$ and $\approx 3\times$ for the two set of benchmarks, respectively.

preprint2022arXivOpen access
0citations
0reviews
0saves
Nocode
Nodataset
0institutions

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this graph slice

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.