Paper detail

Permutation tests for the equality of covariance operators of functional data with applications to evolutionary biology

In this paper, we generalize the metric-based permutation test for the equality of covariance operators proposed by Pigoli et al. (2014) to the case of multiple samples of functional data. To this end, the non-parametric combination methodology of Pesarin and Salmaso (2010) is used to combine all the pairwise comparisons between samples into a global test. Different combining functions and permutation strategies are reviewed and analyzed in detail. The resulting test allows to make inference on the equality of the covariance operators of multiple groups and, if there is evidence to reject the null hypothesis, to identify the pairs of groups having different covariances. It is shown that, for some combining functions, step-down adjusting procedures are available to control for the multiple testing problem in this setting. The empirical power of this new test is then explored via simulations and compared with those of existing alternative approaches in different scenarios. Finally, the proposed methodology is applied to data from wheel running activity experiments, that used selective breeding to study the evolution of locomotor behavior in mice.

preprint2017arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access4 authors2 topics

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.