Paper detail

Peripheral, ultrarelativistic production of particles in heavy ion collisions

The cross sections for the production of two-pions in ultraperipheral ultrarelativistic heavy ion collisions, calculated in the impact parameter Equivalent Photon Approximation (EPA), are presented. Differential distributions in impact parameter, dipion invariant mass, single pion and dipion rapidity, pion transverse momentum and pion pseudorapidity are shown. The $γγ\to π^+ π^-$ subprocess constitutes a background to the $A A \to A ρ^0 (\to π^+ π^-) A$ process, initiated by emission of a photon by one of colliding nuclei. Only a part of the dipion invariant mass distribution associated with the $γγ$-collisions can be visible as the cross section for the $A A \to A ρ^0 A$ reaction is very large. Differential distributions for two $ρ^0$ meson production in exclusive ultraperipheral, ultrarelativistic collisions via a double scattering mechanism are presented. The cross section for $γA \to ρ^0 A$ is parametrized based on a calculation from the literature. Smearing of $ρ^0$ masses is taken into account. The results of calculations are compared to experimental data obtained at RHIC and to the contribution of the two-photon mechanism. The double scattering mechanism populates larger $ρ^0 ρ^0$ invariant masses and larger rapidity distances between the two $ρ^0$ mesons compared to the $γγ$ fusion. It gives a significant contribution to the $A A \to A A π^+ π^- π^+ π^-$ reaction. Some observables related to charged pions are presented. The results of our calculation are compared with the STAR collaboration results for four charged pion production. While the shape in invariant mass of the four-pion system is very similar to the measured one, the predicted cross section constitutes only 20 \% of the measured one. \end{abstract}

preprint2014arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access1 author2 topics

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.