Paper detail

Peripheral Nerve Stimulation limits with fast narrow and broad-band pulses

Peripheral Nerve Stimulation (PNS) constrains the clinical performance of Magnetic Resonance and Particle Imaging (MRI and MPI) systems. Extensive magneto-stimulation studies have been carried out recently in the field of MPI, where typical operation frequencies range from single to tens of kilo-hertz. PNS literature is scarce for MRI in this regime, where the resonant character of MPI coils prevents studies of broad-band excitation pulses. We have constructed an apparatus for PNS threshold determination on a subject's limb, capable of narrow and broad-band magnetic excitation with pulse characteristic times down to 40 us. From a first set of measurements on 51 volunteers, we observe that PNS limits coincide for sinusoidal (biphasic narrow-band) and triangular (biphasic broad-band) excitations, and are slightly lower for trapezoidal (monophasic broad-band) pulses. We have also measured statistically significant correlations of PNS sensitivity with arm size and body weight, and no correlation with height or gender. As opposed to resonant systems, our setup allows the execution of arbitrarily short pulse trains. We have confirmed thresholds increase significantly as trains transition from tens to a few pulses also in these fast timescales. By changing the polarity of the coils in our setup, we also looked at the influence of the spatial distribution of magnetic field strength on PNS effects. We find that thresholds are higher in an approximately linearly inhomogeneous field (relevant to MRI) than in a rather homogeneous distribution (as in MPI). Finally, given the large intersubject variability of PNS sensitivity, we propose employing a versatile low-cost system (such as presented here) for fast offline determination of a subject's limits prior to medical scanning, and then using this information to boost clinical imaging while preserving the patient's safety.

preprint2020arXivOpen access
0citations
0reviews
0saves
Nocode
Nodataset
0institutions

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this graph slice

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.