Paper detail

Performance-Portable Optimization and Analysis of Multiple Right-Hand Sides in a Lattice QCD Solver

Managing the high computational cost of iterative solvers for sparse linear systems is a known challenge in scientific computing. Moreover, scientific applications often face memory bandwidth constraints, making it critical to optimize data locality and enhance the efficiency of data transport. We extend the lattice QCD solver DD-$α$AMG to incorporate multiple right-hand sides (rhs) for both the Wilson-Dirac operator evaluation and the GMRES solver, with and without odd-even preconditioning. To optimize auto-vectorization, we introduce a flexible interface that supports various data layouts and implement a new data layout for better SIMD utilization. We evaluate our optimizations on both x86 and Arm clusters, demonstrating performance portability with similar speedups. A key contribution of this work is the performance analysis of our optimizations, which reveals the complexity introduced by architectural constraints and compiler behavior. Additionally, we explore different implementations leveraging a new matrix instruction set for Arm called SME and provide an early assessment of its potential benefits.

preprint2026arXivOpen access
0citations
0reviews
0saves
Nocode
Nodataset
0institutions

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this graph slice

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.