Paper detail

Performance of adiabatic melting as a method to pursue the lowest possible temperature in $^3$He and $^3$He-$^4$He mixture at the $^4$He crystallization pressure

We studied a novel cooling method, in which $^3$He and $^4$He are mixed at the $^4$He crystallization pressure at temperatures below $0.5\,\mathrm{mK}$. We describe the experimental setup in detail, and present an analysis of its performance under varying isotope contents, temperatures, and operational modes. Further, we developed a computational model of the system, which was required to determine the lowest temperatures obtained, since our mechanical oscillator thermometers already became insensitive at the low end of the temperature range, extending down to $\left(90\pm20\right)\,\mathrm{μK\approx}\frac{T_{c}}{\left(29\pm5\right)}$ ($T_{c}$ of pure $^3$He). We did not observe any indication of superfluidity of the $^3$He component in the isotope mixture. The performance of the setup was limited by the background heat leak of the order of $30\,\mathrm{pW}$ at low melting rates, and by the heat leak caused by the flow of $^4$He in the superleak line at high melting rates up to $500\,\mathrm{μmol/s}$. The optimal mixing rate between $^3$He and $^4$He, with the heat leak taken into account, was found to be about $100..150\,\mathrm{μmol/s}$. We suggest improvements to the experimental design to reduce the ultimate achievable temperature further.

preprint2019arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access3 authors1 topic

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.