Paper detail

Performance Modeling Sparse MTTKRP Using Optical Static Random Access Memory on FPGA

Electrical static random memory (E-SRAM) is the current standard for internal static memory in Field Programmable Gate Array (FPGA). Despite the dramatic improvement in E-SRAM technology over the past decade, the goal of ultra-fast, energy-efficient static random memory has yet to be achieved with E-SRAM technology. However, preliminary research into optical static random access memory (O-SRAM) has shown promising results in creating energy-efficient ultra-fast static memories. This paper investigates the advantage of O-SRAM over E-SRAM in access speed and energy performance while executing sparse Matricized Tensor Times Khatri-Rao Product (spMTTKRP). spMTTKRP is an essential component of tensor decomposition algorithms which is heavily used in data science applications. The evaluation results show O-SRAMs can achieve speeds of 1.1x - 2.9x while saving 2.8x - 8.1x energy compared to conventional E-SRAM technology.

preprint2022arXivOpen access
0citations
0reviews
0saves
Nocode
Nodataset
0institutions

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this graph slice

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.