Paper detail

Performance bounds for priority-based stochastic coflow scheduling

We consider the coflow scheduling problem in the non-clairvoyant setting, assuming that flow sizes are realized on-line according to given probability distributions. The goal is to minimize the weighted average completion time of coflows in expectation. We first obtain inequalities for this problem that are valid for all non-anticipative order-based rate-allocation policies and define a polyhedral relaxation of the performance space of such scheduling policies. This relaxation is used to analyze the performance of a simple priority policy in which the priority order is computed by Sincronia from expected flow sizes instead of their unknown actual values. We establish a bound on the approximation ratio of this priority policy with respect to the optimal priority policy for arbitrary probability distributions of flow sizes (with finite first and second moments). Tighter upper bounds are obtained for some specific distributions. Extensive numerical results suggest that performance of the proposed policy is much better than the upper bound.

preprint2026arXivOpen access
0citations
0reviews
0saves
Nocode
Nodataset
0institutions

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this graph slice

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.