Paper detail

Performance Analysis of Interference-Limited Three-Phase Two-Way Relaying with Direct Channel

This paper investigates the performance of interference-limited three-phase two-way relaying with direct channel between two terminals in Rayleigh fading channels. The outage probability, sum bit error rate (BER) and ergodic sum rate are analyzed for a general model that both terminals and relay are corrupted by co-channel interference. We first derive the closed-form expressions of cumulative distribution function (CDF) for received signal-to-interference-plus-noise ratio (SINR) at the terminal. Based on the results for CDF, the lower bounds, approximate expressions as well as the asymptotic expressions for outage probability and sum BER are derived in closed-form with different computational complexities and accuracies. The approximate expression for ergodic sum rate is also presented. With the theoretic results, we consider the optimal power allocation at the relay and optimal relay location problems that aiming to minimize the outage and sum BER performances of the protocol. It is shown that jointly optimization of power and relay location can provide the best performance. Simulation results are presented to study the effect of system parameters while verify the theoretic analysis. The results show that three-phase TWR protocol can outperform two-phase TWR protocol in ergodic sum rate when the interference power at the relay is much larger than that at the terminals. This is in sharp contrast with the conclusion in interference free scenario. Moreover, we show that an estimation error on the interference channel will not affect the system performance significantly, while a very small estimation error on the desired channels can degrade the performance considerably.

preprint2014arXivOpen access
0citations
0reviews
0saves
Nocode
Nodataset
0institutions

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this graph slice

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.