Paper detail

Performance Analysis of Incremental LMS over Flat Fading Channels

We study the effect of fading in the communication channels between sensor nodes on the performance of the incremental least mean square (ILMS) algorithm, and derive steady state performance metrics, including the mean-square deviation (MSD), excess mean-square error (EMSE) and meansquare error (MSE). We obtain conditions for mean convergence of the ILMS algorithm, and show that in the presence of fading channels, the ILMS algorithm is asymptotically biased. Furthermore, the dynamic range for mean stability depends only on the mean channel gain, and under simplifying technical assumptions, we show that the MSD, EMSE and MSE are non-decreasing functions of the channel gain variances, with mean-square convergence to the steady states possible only if the channel gain variances are limited. We derive sufficient conditions to ensure mean-square convergence, and verify our results through simulations.

preprint2015arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access2 authors4 topics

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.