Abstract

Secure multi-party computation (MPC) is a fundamental problem in secure distributed computing. An MPC protocol allows a set of nn mutually distrusting parties to carry out any joint computation of their private inputs, without disclosing any additional information about their inputs. MPC with information-theoretic security provides the strongest security guarantees and remains secure even against computationally unbounded adversaries. Perfectly-secure MPC protocols is a class of information-theoretically secure MPC protocols, which provides all the security guarantees in an error-free fashion. The focus of this work is perfectly-secure MPC. Known protocols are designed assuming either a synchronous or asynchronous communication network. It is well known that perfectly-secure synchronous MPC protocol is possible as long as adversary can corrupt any ts<n/3t_s < n/3 parties. On the other hand, perfectly-secure asynchronous MPC protocol can tolerate up to ta<n/4t_a < n/4 corrupt parties. A natural question is does there exist a single MPC protocol for the setting where the parties are not aware of the exact network type and which can tolerate up to ts<n/3t_s < n/3 corruptions in a synchronous network and up to ta<n/4t_a < n/4 corruptions in an asynchronous network. We design such a best-of-both-worlds perfectly-secure MPC protocol, provided 3ts+ta<n3t_s + t_a < n holds. For designing our protocol, we design two important building blocks, which are of independent interest. The first building block is a best-of-both-worlds Byzantine agreement (BA) protocol tolerating t<n/3t < n/3 corruptions and which remains secure, both in a synchronous as well as asynchronous network. The second building block is a polynomial-based best-of-both-worlds verifiable secret-sharing (VSS) protocol, which can tolerate up to tst_s and tat_a corruptions in a synchronous and in an asynchronous network respectively.

Explore this paper’s authors, topics and related work.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Reviews 0

Write a reviewWrite

No reviews yet.

Discussion 0

Add a commentWrite

No comments yet.