Paper detail

Perception-in-the-Loop Adversarial Examples

We present a scalable, black box, perception-in-the-loop technique to find adversarial examples for deep neural network classifiers. Black box means that our procedure only has input-output access to the classifier, and not to the internal structure, parameters, or intermediate confidence values. Perception-in-the-loop means that the notion of proximity between inputs can be directly queried from human participants rather than an arbitrarily chosen metric. Our technique is based on covariance matrix adaptation evolution strategy (CMA-ES), a black box optimization approach. CMA-ES explores the search space iteratively in a black box manner, by generating populations of candidates according to a distribution, choosing the best candidates according to a cost function, and updating the posterior distribution to favor the best candidates. We run CMA-ES using human participants to provide the fitness function, using the insight that the choice of best candidates in CMA-ES can be naturally modeled as a perception task: pick the top $k$ inputs perceptually closest to a fixed input. We empirically demonstrate that finding adversarial examples is feasible using small populations and few iterations. We compare the performance of CMA-ES on the MNIST benchmark with other black-box approaches using $L_p$ norms as a cost function, and show that it performs favorably both in terms of success in finding adversarial examples and in minimizing the distance between the original and the adversarial input. In experiments on the MNIST, CIFAR10, and GTSRB benchmarks, we demonstrate that CMA-ES can find perceptually similar adversarial inputs with a small number of iterations and small population sizes when using perception-in-the-loop. Finally, we show that networks trained specifically to be robust against $L_\infty$ norm can still be susceptible to perceptually similar adversarial examples.

preprint2019arXivOpen access
0citations
0reviews
0saves
Nocode
Nodataset
0institutions

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this graph slice

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.