Paper detail

Perception-aware receding horizon trajectory planning for multicopters with visual-inertial odometry

Visual inertial odometry (VIO) is widely used for the state estimation of multicopters, but it may function poorly in environments with few visual features or in overly aggressive flights. In this work, we propose a perception-aware collision avoidance trajectory planner for multicopters, that may be used with any feature-based VIO algorithm. Our approach is able to fly the vehicle to a goal position at fast speed, avoiding obstacles in an unknown stationary environment while achieving good VIO state estimation accuracy. The proposed planner samples a group of minimum jerk trajectories and finds collision-free trajectories among them, which are then evaluated based on their speed to the goal and perception quality. Both the motion blur of features and their locations are considered for the perception quality. Our novel consideration of the motion blur of features enables automatic adaptation of the trajectory's aggressiveness under environments with different light levels. The best trajectory from the evaluation is tracked by the vehicle and is updated in a receding horizon manner when new images are received from the camera. Only generic assumptions about the VIO are made, so that the planner may be used with various existing systems. The proposed method can run in real-time on a small embedded computer on board. We validated the effectiveness of our proposed approach through experiments in both indoor and outdoor environments. Compared to a perception-agnostic planner, the proposed planner kept more features in the camera's view and made the flight less aggressive, making the VIO more accurate. It also reduced VIO failures, which occurred for the perception-agnostic planner but not for the proposed planner. The ability of the proposed planner to fly through dense obstacles was also validated. The experiment video can be found at https://youtu.be/qO3LZIrpwtQ.

preprint2022arXivOpen access
0citations
0reviews
0saves
Nocode
Nodataset
0institutions

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this graph slice

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.