Paper detail

PenPC: A Two-step Approach to Estimate the Skeletons of High Dimensional Directed Acyclic Graphs

Estimation of the skeleton of a directed acyclic graph (DAG) is of great importance for understanding the underlying DAG and causaleffects can be assessed from the skeleton when the DAG is notidentifiable. We propose a novel method named PenPC toestimate the skeleton of a high-dimensional DAG by a two-stepapproach. We first estimate the non-zero entries of a concentrationmatrix using penalized regression, and then fix the differencebetween the concentration matrix and the skeleton by evaluating aset of conditional independence hypotheses. For high dimensionalproblems where the number of vertices $p$ is in polynomial orexponential scale of sample size $n$, we study the asymptoticproperty of PenPC on two types of graphs: traditionalrandom graphs where all the vertices have the same expected numberof neighbors, and scale-free graphs where a few vertices may have alarge number of neighbors. As illustrated by extensive simulationsand applications on gene expression data of cancer patients, PenPChas higher sensitivity and specificity than the standard-of-the-artmethod, the PC-stable algorithm.

preprint2014arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access3 authors2 topics

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.