Paper detail

Penguin-dominated $B \to ϕK_1(1270)$ and $ϕK_1(1400)$ decays in the perturbative QCD approach

We investigate the CP-averaged branching ratios, the polarization fractions, the relative phases, and the CP-violating asymmetries of the penguin-dominated $B \to ϕK_1(1270) $ and $ ϕK_1(1400)$ decays in the perturbative QCD(pQCD) approach, where $K_1(1270)$ and $K_1(1400)$ are believed to be the mixtures of two distinct types of axial-vector $K_{1A}(^3P_1)$ and $K_{1B}(^1P_1)$ states with different behavior, however, their mixing angle $θ_{K_1}$ is still a hot and controversial topic presently. By numerical evaluations with two different mixing angles $θ_{K_1} \sim 33^\circ$ and $58^\circ$ and phenomenological analysis, we find that: (a) the pQCD predictions for the branching ratio, the longitudinal polarization fraction and the direct CP violation of $B^\pm \to ϕK_1(1270)^\pm$ decay with the smaller angle $33^\circ$ are in good agreement with the currently available data; (b) though the central values significantly exceed the available upper limit, both pQCD predictions of $Br(B^\pm \to ϕK_1(1400)^\pm)$ with two different mixing angles are consistent with that obtained in QCD factorization and with the preliminary data in 2$σ$ errors. These results and other relevant predictions for the considered decays will be further tested by the LHCb and the forthcoming Super-B experiments; (c) the weak annihilation contributions can play an important role in $B \to ϕK_1(1270)$ and $ϕK_1(1400)$ decays; (d) these pQCD predictions combined with the future precision measurements can examine the reliability of the factorization approach employed here, but also explore the complicated QCD dynamics and mixing angle $θ_{K_1}$ of the axial-vector $K_1(1270)$ and $K_1(1400)$ system.

preprint2014arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access3 authors2 topics

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.