Paper detail

Penguin contribution to width difference and CP asymmetry in $B_q$-$\bar B_q$ mixing at order $α_s^2 N_f$

We present new contributions to the decay matrix element $Γ_{12}^q$ of the $B_q$-$\bar B_q$ mixing complex, where $q=d$ or $s$. Our new results constitute the order $α_s^2 N_f$ corrections to the penguin contributions to the Wilson coefficients entering $Γ_{12}^q$ with full dependence on the charm quark mass. This is the first step towards the prediction of the CP asymmetry $a_{\rm fs}^q$ quantifying CP violation in mixing at next-to-next-to-leading logarithmic order (NNLO) in quantum chromodynamics (QCD) and further improves the prediction of the width difference $ΔΓ_q$ between the two neutral-meson eigenstates. We find a sizable effect from the non-zero charm mass and our partial NNLO result decreases the NLO penguin corrections to $a_{\rm fs}^q$ by 37\% and those to $ΔΓ_q$ by 16\%. We further update the Standard-Model NLO predictions for $a_{\rm fs}^q$ and the ratio of the width and mass differences of the $B_q$ eigenstates: If we express the results in terms of the pole mass of the bottom quark we find $a_{\rm fs}^s=(2.07 \pm 0.10)\cdot 10^{-5}$, $a_{\rm fs}^d=(-4.71 \pm 0.24)\cdot 10^{-4}$, $ΔΓ_s/Δ{M}_s = (4.33 \pm 1.26)\cdot 10^{-3}$, and $ΔΓ_d/Δ{M}_d = (4.48 \pm 1.19)\cdot 10^{-3}$. In the $\overline{\rm MS}$ scheme these numbers read $a^s_{\rm fs} =(2.04 \pm 0.11)\cdot 10^{-5}$, $a^d_{\rm fs} = (-4.64 \pm 0.25)\cdot 10^{-4}$, $ΔΓ_s/Δ{M}_s = (4.97 \pm 1.02)\cdot 10^{-3}$, and $ΔΓ_d/Δ{M}_d = (5.07 \pm 0.96)\cdot 10^{-3}$.

preprint2020arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access6 authors1 topic

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.