Paper detail

Penalized maximum likelihood estimation and effective dimension

This paper extends some prominent statistical results including \emph{Fisher Theorem and Wilks phenomenon} to the penalized maximum likelihood estimation with a quadratic penalization. It appears that sharp expansions for the penalized MLE \(\tilde{\thetav}_{G} \) and for the penalized maximum likelihood can be obtained without involving any asymptotic arguments, the results only rely on smoothness and regularity properties of the of the considered log-likelihood function. The error of estimation is specified in terms of the effective dimension \(p_G \) of the parameter set which can be much smaller than the true parameter dimension and even allows an infinite dimensional functional parameter. In the i.i.d. case, the Fisher expansion for the penalized MLE can be established under the constraint "\(p_G^{2}/n\) is small" while the remainder in the Wilks result is of order \(p_G^{3}/n \).

preprint2015arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access1 author1 topic

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.