Paper detail

Pebble Motion on Graphs with Rotations: Efficient Feasibility Tests and Planning Algorithms

We study the problem of planning paths for $p$ distinguishable pebbles (robots) residing on the vertices of an $n$-vertex connected graph with $p \le n$. A pebble may move from a vertex to an adjacent one in a time step provided that it does not collide with other pebbles. When $p = n$, the only collision free moves are synchronous rotations of pebbles on disjoint cycles of the graph. We show that the feasibility of such problems is intrinsically determined by the diameter of a (unique) permutation group induced by the underlying graph. Roughly speaking, the diameter of a group $\mathbf G$ is the minimum length of the generator product required to reach an arbitrary element of $\mathbf G$ from the identity element. Through bounding the diameter of this associated permutation group, which assumes a maximum value of $O(n^2)$, we establish a linear time algorithm for deciding the feasibility of such problems and an $O(n^3)$ algorithm for planning complete paths.

preprint2014arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access2 authors2 topics

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.